Abstract:
The core of this publication is the life of Dieter Schulz (*1941), its special developmental condi-tions, and the author´s “career”. Already the obituary in the editorial introduction is mentioning the extraordinary shape of this life. The following text, i. e. the authors´ autobiography in 42 chapters, was written at first during ten years as prison inmate, and then, upon request, continued till his later life as eventually characterized by physical decline. During this life course he experienced and mas-tered some vivid, partially even exciting and enthralling periods. Among them five deserve to be sketched here: (1) The end of World War II and the post-war confusion till 1949 in East-Prussia, the occupation by the Red Army, and the survival conditions for the remaining Germans. The Russian language he had swiftly learned during those years formed a stable base for his successful business as black-market paddler starting already around 10-11 years (!) and continued later in the German Democratic Republic (GDR). (2) His “career” as pupil in different GDR approved schools started rather accidentally on the day of the workers´ revolt of 17 June 1953; it was determined by the in-competence of the educators, and a series of very adventurous escapes. (3) After eventually having reached “the West” of Germany, and rejected by his father, he had to battle his own way. On the positive side, he succeeded for instance with a first class vocational training as waiter and then ship steward, even restaurant director. The dark side developed step by step, culminating in throwing a black lover of his wife over the balcony, which eventually was punished by his first prison sentence to be served in a high security penitentiary. (4) In liberty again he rather accidentally got into a se-ries of meticulously planned vending machine fraud; unfortunately for him, he repeatedly experi-enced bad luck with his accomplices and, also later-on, consecutively with his female cohabitants. (5) In the latest phase of his criminal career, he engaged in a voluminous illegal drug business, with the plan to finance this from counterfeit bank notes, and eventually to go into hiding. But the final “grand coup” ended disastrous: An armed bank robbery failed miserably with murderous outcome.
Dieter Schulz is presenting himself skillfully, and one is inclined for a long distance to belief in all he is telling. However, his son Sascha brings about some remembrances and experiences of his own and, by doing so, can alter a bit his fathers pretended clean image of an offender solely developing out of harmful, if not sinister, circumstances in the first decades of his life. However, the author impresses, throughout his life and career, starting as “small but brave boy”, and developing into a “fighter” respectively as a “getting-up guy”. This life poses a challenge for criminological research on how long-lasting deviance is originating and strengthening, and how it is getting reproduced later-on. So far one can see this publication as embedded in a long tradition. Already in a treatise of Ja-cob Georg Schaeffler (1745-1814), being city councilman of “Sulz at the Neckar”, one can find the basic idea that social grievances and evils are to be considered as the source of delinquency and crime, and therefore the plan to place the children of malefactors or hoodlums as early as possible in foster families.
As a person and in a generalized perspective, Dieter Schulz does hardly represent a particularly unique example of an eventful life meandering between phases of civic life, partially even some-how successful, and criminal engagement leading to imprisonment. There are other offender biog-raphies that made their way into recognized publications, be it in belletristic literature or in scholarly edited books. However, his unvarnished realism in describing post-war social conditions and devel-opments, also everyday scenes embedded in the East-German black-market and, later-on the West-German economic boom, presents an entertaining moral portrait of “his time period”. His own ques-tion asked: “Had it been worthwhile to safe this awful life from the bomb impact?” And his eventu-al answer is: “My life is not necessarily a worthwhile example for others, but it is worth reading!”