| dc.contributor.author |
Külpmann, Robert |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Symanczyk Joppe, Vilma |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2015-12-21T11:36:49Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2015-12-21T11:36:49Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2015-11-04 |
|
| dc.identifier.other |
453576435 |
de_DE |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10900/67218 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-dspace-672180 |
de_DE |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-8638 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
Our paper deals with the omission of direct arguments in non-elliptical contexts. We argue that valency requirements do not suffice to explain argument omission and that sentence type also plays a crucial role. Our argumentation is based on a set of acceptability rating studies. We conclude with a proposal how our results could be modeled in the grammar. |
en |
| dc.language.iso |
en |
de_DE |
| dc.publisher |
Universität Tübingen |
de_DE |
| dc.rights |
ubt-podok |
de_DE |
| dc.rights.uri |
http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_mit_pod.php?la=de |
de_DE |
| dc.rights.uri |
http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_mit_pod.php?la=en |
en |
| dc.subject.classification |
Linguistik |
de_DE |
| dc.subject.ddc |
400 |
de_DE |
| dc.title |
Argument Omission between Valency and Construction |
en |
| dc.type |
ConferencePaper |
de_DE |
| utue.publikation.fachbereich |
Allgemeine u. vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft |
de_DE |
| utue.publikation.fakultaet |
5 Philosophische Fakultät |
de_DE |
| utue.publikation.fakultaet |
5 Philosophische Fakultät |
de_DE |
| utue.opus.portal |
proceed6th-theo-lingustics |
de_DE |
