dc.contributor.author |
Portele, Yvonne |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Bader, Markus |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-08-31T08:23:50Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-08-31T08:23:50Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017-08 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
492929270 |
de_DE |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10900/77656 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-dspace-776563 |
de_DE |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-19057 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
We review recent experiments and corpus data from our ongoing investigation of p(ersonal) and d(emonstrative) pronouns. Contrary to a widespread belief, d-pronouns did not always refer to non-topical antecedents in case of referential ambiguity. More generally, the data that we review show that a complex interplay of factors governs the processing of p-pronouns and d-pronouns. During language comprehension, syntactic function, position, and topichood of the antecedent are all taken into account when interpreting a p- or d-pronoun. Similarly, the choice between p- and d-pronoun during language production is heavily influenced by these three factors. We propose an interpretation and a production rule for d-pronouns, both based on prominence features. For interpretation, the proposed rule simply counts prominence features and assigns the d-pronoun the antecedent that is least prominent. For production, we propose a similar rule for choosing between a p- and d-pronoun for referring to a given antecedent. In contrast to interpretation, the rule for choosing a pronominal form makes use of weighted prominence features and relates prominence to production frequency in an exponential way. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
de_DE |
dc.publisher |
Universität Tübingen |
de_DE |
dc.rights |
ubt-podok |
de_DE |
dc.rights.uri |
http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_mit_pod.php?la=de |
de_DE |
dc.rights.uri |
http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_mit_pod.php?la=en |
en |
dc.subject.classification |
Linguistik , Personalpronomen |
de_DE |
dc.subject.ddc |
400 |
de_DE |
dc.subject.ddc |
430 |
de_DE |
dc.subject.other |
Pronoun resolution |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Choice of referential form |
en |
dc.subject.other |
D-Pronouns |
en |
dc.subject.other |
German |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Continuation experiments |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Corpus study |
en |
dc.title |
Personal Pronouns and D-Pronouns in German: Connecting Comprehension to Production |
en |
dc.type |
ConferenceObject |
de_DE |
utue.publikation.fachbereich |
Allgemeine u. vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft |
de_DE |
utue.publikation.fakultaet |
5 Philosophische Fakultät |
de_DE |
utue.opus.portal |
ProcLingEvi2016 |
de_DE |